Vaccine Controversy

With the intense controversy and near hysteria over vaccination, for the thoughtful, enquiring person or the concerned parent trying to make wise choices for their children, sorting out the data and finding research done without vested interests controlling the outcome, can be a daunting challenge.

The basic concept of vaccination is brilliant, somewhat reminiscent of homeopathy—like cures like. Without question, vaccines have made a difference in lowering the prevalence of certain diseases throughout the world. Yet, a small but significant percentage of people have had major, life-disrupting reactions to the vaccines that have left them permanently impaired. Some have even died after being vaccinated, as in the case of the HPV vaccine for girls. In fact the Japanese government no longer recommends Gardasil, one of the vaccines for HPV, after there was a series of MS cases and other auto-immune diseases in girls that occurred after being vaccinated.

The strident voices say “We cannot compromise public health for the sake of the few who have adverse reactions.” But, if you are a parent with a child who has been brain-damaged after being vaccinated, those words offer no comfort.

Unbiased research has been done to show how the vaccines and their adjuvants—the added preservatives and immune stimulants—can affect the brain, nervous and immune system in animal studies. But these studies are not being made readily available to the general public. Nor are the reports of the numbers and types of injuries sustained after vaccination.

What I would like to see researched and developed is a rapid and inexpensive test that could predict who would be at risk for having a serious adverse reaction—something like a mouth swab for DNA testing to check for genetic predisposition to having harmful effects from vaccine adjuvants, like the mercury (thimerosal), aluminum, and formaldehyde. The test would need to also assess risk of auto-immune disease caused by the proteins in the vaccine itself which can cause a cross reaction with proteins in the brain, resulting in dangerous brain inflammation.

And, of course I’d also like to see research being done on ways that the vaccines can have less potential for harm, while remaining effective.

Patients often ask me if they or their children should get vaccinated. I do not answer that question for them. But, I do recommend they search the unbiased data themselves and then make up their minds. I also recommend that the following two questions are considered when making decisions about vaccinating:

  • Is there a family history of severe allergies, chemical sensitivities, neurological disorders, auto-immune disease, or any other evidence of immune dysfunction that would put the child at increase risk for having a serious reaction?
  • Was there any kind of reaction—like high fever, prolonged irritability or changes in behavior after previous vaccines?

So, what can parents do if the answers to those questions are positive?

Some of my patients with young children who fit the at-risk criteria choose to space out the vaccine schedule, giving ample time for the immune system to “calm down” after each vaccine, in order to avoid over-stimulation. And they can also insist on thimerosal-free vaccines. Other parents choose to avoid vaccinating their children until they are older and their brains are more developed and less vulnerable to auto-immune reactions. And then a few parents try to navigate the system without vaccinating their children at all.

In these times of almost militaristic enforcement of vaccination, it’s important we make informed decisions.

For a link to the National Vaccine Information Center, click here.


Comments

Vaccine Controversy — 8 Comments

  1. Very interesting article, Erica. Incidentally, I recently read on Dr. Mercola’s site that a nephrologist started noticing a correlation between flu vaccines in adults and subsequent sudden kidney failure in some individuals. I’m sorry to be lacking the name of the doctor. She has written a book about this, which has made her persona non grata in many medical circles….It was also mentioned that many hospitals refuse to accept inpatients unless they have had a flu vaccine.

  2. A highly controversial subject like this really needs an objective, informed and rational perspective presented so that people can take reasoned responsibility for their decisions concerning vaccines. It is not clear, however, how the average person will gain access to unbiased research: “studies [which] are not being made readily available to the general public.” It is important for people concerned about this issue to be as informed as possible, and not to simply accept the vociferous and passionate views of the so-called medical authorities, who seem to provide all that we need to know and to belief on the subject.

  3. very interesting book:

    Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History
    by Suzanne Humphries MD

    available on Amazon

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *